News Release 6-Feb-2026

Scientists debunk claim that trees in the Dolomites anticipated a solar eclipse

Peer-Reviewed Publication

Cell Press

Facebook

X

LinkedIn

WeChat

Bluesky

Message

WhatsApp

Email

Around 14 hours before a partial solar eclipse passed over the Dolomites in Northern Italy, a group of spruce trees showed a sudden, synchronized increase in electrical activity. A widely publicized paper by Chiolerio et al. claimed that the trees were anticipating and preparing for the impending solar eclipse. In an opinion paper publishing February 6 in the Cell Press journal Trends in Plant Science, researchers debunked this claim by examining the evidence and offering a simpler explanation: a local thunderstorm coincided with the trees’ increased electrical activity, during which a cluster of lightning strikes struck near the study site.

“To me, this paper represents the encroachment of pseudoscience into the heart of biological research,” says first author Ariel Novoplansky, an evolutionary ecologist at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel. “Instead of considering simpler, well-documented environmental factors, like a heavy rainstorm and a cluster of nearby lightning strikes, the authors leaned into the more seductive idea that the trees were anticipating the impending solar eclipse.”

It is well documented that plants can perceive and respond to changes in environmental conditions and can even anticipate and prepare for future competition from currently harmless neighbors or impending stresses. However, this type of response only occurs when the anticipated event poses a significant challenge and is tightly correlated with predictive cues. In the case of the solar eclipse in question, the event was not significant enough to warrant anticipation, the researchers say, because it was short and involved only a small reduction in light—less of an interruption than some passing clouds.

“The eclipse only reduced light by about 10.5% for two short hours, during which the level of sunlight was approximately twice what the trees could practically use,” says Novoplansky. “Frequent fluctuations in cloud cover at the study location change light quality and quantity by much bigger amplitudes.”

Even if the solar eclipse was significant enough to warrant a preemptive response, the researchers showed that the trees would not have had the ability to anticipate its coming. The solar eclipse was the 53rd in the Saros 124 sequence, a series of eclipses that occur every 18 years, 11 days, and 8 hours. Chiolerio et al. showed that older, larger trees displayed greater increases in electrical activity compared to younger trees and claimed that this showed that the older trees were communicating with the younger trees based on their previous eclipse experiences. However, the debunkers note that each solar eclipse is unique in its path, magnitude, and duration, so even if older trees could “remember” previous eclipses, that information wouldn’t help them anticipate future eclipses. Additionally, they note that the gravitational changes associated with solar eclipses—the signal the trees were supposedly responding to—are similar in magnitude to the gravitational differences that occur during a new moon and are therefore uninformative.

Finally, the researchers note that Chiolerio et al. only measured a very small number of trees: three living trees and five stumps. They caution researchers and members of the media and general public from succumbing to sensational narratives that lack evidence and defy reason.

“The electrical activity of trees is a real phenomenon but it’s still a nascent field of inquiry,” says Novoplansky. “The idea that variations in electrical signals, observable even in dead logs, might encode memory, anticipation, or collective responsiveness requires a few extraordinary leaps, none of which were supported in the study. The forest is wondrous enough without inventing irrational yet superficially fantastic claims of anticipatory responsiveness or communication based only on correlation.”

###

This research was supported by funding from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) and the V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation.

Trends in Plant Science, Novoplansky et al., “Eclipse of reason: Debunking speculative anticipatory behavior in trees” http://cell.com/trends/plant-science/fulltext/S1360-1385(25)00355-3

Trends in Plant Science (@TrendsPlantSci), published by Cell Press, is a monthly review journal that features broad coverage of basic plant science, from molecular biology through to ecology. Aimed at researchers, students, and teachers, its articles are authoritative and written by both leaders in the field and rising stars. Visit http://www.cell.com/trends/plant-science. To receive Cell Press media alerts, please contact press@cell.com.